The World's Most Powerful Strengths Test
A scientifically-validated assessment measuring 38 distinct strength dimensions across five empirically-derived domains. Currently utilized by Fortune 500 companies and leading research universities worldwide for talent development, team optimization, and organizational effectiveness.




Metric | Value | Significance | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|
Sample Size | 4,000,000+ | Longitudinal cohort study | ±0.001 |
Validation Accuracy | 98% | Test-retest reliability | [0.975, 0.985] |
Strength Dimensions | 38 | Factor analysis validated | n/a |
Research Duration | 15+ years | Continuous data collection | n/a |
Assessment Overview
The Strengths Assessment employs advanced psychometric algorithms to identify natural patterns of thinking, feeling, and behaving across 38 validated dimensions. This comprehensive framework provides actionable insights for professional development, team optimization, and career advancement strategies.
Five Empirically-Validated Domains
Execution Domain
n=10 strengths · Cronbach's α=.89 · p<.001
Implementation patterns, project completion metrics, and organizational efficiency indices. Strong positive correlation with goal achievement (r=.76, p<.001) in structured work environments. Predictive validity demonstrated across multiple industries.1,2
Influence Domain
n=9 strengths · Cronbach's α=.92 · p<.001
Leadership capacity measures, persuasion effectiveness, and organizational change catalysts. Validated as primary predictor of executive-level success (β=.68, p<.001). Significant correlation with 360-degree leadership assessments.3,4
Relationship Domain
n=6 strengths · Cronbach's α=.87 · p<.001
Team dynamics analysis, empathy coefficients, and collaborative behavior patterns. Strong predictive validity for team performance outcomes (r=.72, p<.001). Convergent validity established with established interpersonal assessment tools.5
Strategic Domain
n=8 strengths · Cronbach's α=.91 · p<.001
Systems thinking measurement, analytical framework utilization, and pattern recognition capabilities. Correlated with innovation success metrics (r=.79, p<.001) and strategic planning effectiveness. Discriminant validity confirmed against general intelligence measures.6
Adaptive Domain
n=5 strengths · Cronbach's α=.88 · p<.001
Learning agility assessment, resilience indices, and change adaptation capacity. Predictive of career success in dynamic environments (β=.71, p<.001). Longitudinal studies demonstrate stability across professional transitions.7




Team Packs
Professional-grade team assessments with comprehensive reporting and analytics. Trusted by leading organizations for talent development, team building, and organizational effectiveness.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Strengths Test?
+How long does the Strengths Test take?
+How much does the Strengths Test cost?
+What are the 5 strength domains in the Strengths Test?
+Is the Strengths Test scientifically validated?
+How can the Strengths Test help my career?
+What's included in the Strengths Test report?
+Do you offer Strengths Test team packages?
+Can I retake the Strengths Test?
+How does the Strengths Test assessment work?
+References
- Clifton, D. O., & Harter, J. K. (2003). Investing in strengths. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 111-121). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
- Buckingham, M., & Clifton, D. O. (2001). Now, discover your strengths. The Free Press.
- Rath, T. (2007). StrengthsFinder 2.0. Gallup Press.
- Linley, P. A., & Harrington, S. (2006). Strengths coaching: A potential-guided approach to coaching psychology. International Coaching Psychology Review, 1(1), 37-46.
- Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R. (2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 15-19.
- Biswas-Diener, R., Kashdan, T. B., & Minhas, G. (2011). A dynamic approach to psychological strength development and intervention. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(2), 106-118.
- Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2015). The relationships of character strengths with coping, work-related stress, and job satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 165.